Based on 129 real App Store reviews, here's exactly what users wish Rc Planes Planner apps would build.
Features users are literally asking for in their reviews, ranked by demand.
"there are times when you are out in the middle of no where at a local or private airport where you can't get current weather or wind direction, though the signal for iPhone or any other cel"
"The translated METAR and TAFs often do not include rain and thunderstorms. The raw version does but not the translated version. This is a major flaw that could result in someone getting into severe weather"
"I watched a lot of tutorials, which helped a lot because the interface is not intuitive."
"It was difficult to make a flight plan while in the air if I had"
"I live in USA but I wanted this app to use it in South America for the coming fire season. I got the surprise that the app does not have data on that region."
"the data management page simply does not work. I tried to turn off high resolution data to save space and download time. No luck. I would turn off the switch and delete the data and next update it would down"
Prioritized actions based on user demand and market opportunity.
The catastrophic failure mode (16 crashes in one flight, failures in IMC conditions) represents a safety-critical gap. Positioning as the 'most reliable' EFB with extensive testing and backup systems would directly address the #1 technical complaint.
47% of reviews mention the lifetime subscription betrayal. A competitor offering a legally-binding lifetime option with clear terms could capture all the burned FlyQ customers while building trust. Include sunset clauses upfront to avoid FlyQ's mistake.
Users explicitly state they need extensive tutorials to understand basic functions. A simplified, pilot-focused interface that works intuitively (especially for in-flight plan modifications) would differentiate from both FlyQ and complex competitors.
3.5-hour update times and poor connectivity handling are major pain points. Building with modern sync technology and aggressive caching would provide competitive advantage, especially for pilots at remote airports.
Support complaints appear in 19% of reviews with users reporting bounced emails, ignored bug reports, and admissions that bugs will never be fixed. White-glove support could justify premium pricing and build loyalty in a market where trust has been destroyed.
The full Rc Planes Planner report includes top complaints, UX pain points, pricing intelligence, and detailed competitor weaknesses.
View Full Report — $9.9930-day money-back guarantee