Based on 67 real App Store reviews, here's exactly what users wish Networking Assistant apps would build.
Features users are literally asking for in their reviews, ranked by demand.
"Should let user fill in or correct wrong or blank results."
"doesn't allow naming/description of devices found"
"This is awesome apps. It would be better if it intergrade some stuff like... Shutdown and start up remotely, and etc."
"doesn't report success on wake-on-LAN, doesn't allow naming/description of devices found, no remote shutdown"
"When services are detected on a host, will not allow a connection to that host."
"Only scans the network you are logged into. Doesn't scan other networks, including the locked ones"
Prioritized actions based on user demand and market opportunity.
19% of reviews mention crashes and 18% cite inconsistent detection - reliability is the #1 gap. Users desperately need an app that 'just works' consistently.
10% of reviews specifically call out forced location requirements as dealbreakers. Privacy-first positioning would differentiate immediately and capture users abandoning iNet Pro.
16% struggle with device identification. Allow manual naming that persists, use MAC address databases for auto-detection, and never lose user customizations between scans.
21% complain about outdated UI and lack of screen size support. This is low-hanging fruit - simply being modern and maintained would exceed competitor bars.
Users complain about slow scans and excessive resource consumption. Fast, efficient scanning with clear pause/stop controls would be a major competitive advantage.
The full Networking Assistant report includes top complaints, UX pain points, pricing intelligence, and detailed competitor weaknesses.
View Full Report — $9.9930-day money-back guarantee