Features Users Want Most in Minimalism Companion Apps

"The fact that it's a widget is annoying and clunky. I do not have time unfortunately to go through a whole process to access"

"I really dislike that the app pops up in the background every time you use the widget"

"Phone should be an option"

"Minimal's one and only flaw is that you can't insert photos"

"If you look at Apple's Notes app, you can insert photos and even better format them so they'll be small"

"I would request that you please add more widget panels than just three and the option to change fonts"

"I also don't want my phone to be ugly. Undistracting, yes. But I like to surround myself with beautiful things"

"Sharing as markdow, as text, etc all do the same thing. Idk if devooer even knows what markdown is because it serves no function here"

Build native launcher (not Shortcuts-based)

32% of complaints stem from clunky Shortcut workflows. A true native launcher that opens apps instantly would be a massive competitive advantage and core differentiator.

Design for iOS 26+ Liquid Glass from day one

19% of reviews cite iOS 26 compatibility issues destroying the minimal aesthetic. Building with current iOS constraints ensures product works as advertised and maintains visual promise.

One-time purchase model ($9.99-14.99)

Users strongly prefer ownership over subscriptions for simple tools. Price slightly higher than competition but justify with superior seamless performance and reliability.

Universal app support via URL schemes + fallback

15% complaint rate about limited app compatibility. Supporting Notion, Motion, and other productivity apps captures power users willing to pay premium.

Focus on true friction creation (not just aesthetics)

Users recognize current apps don't actually restrict phone usage since they can swipe away. Build genuine intentional friction mechanisms that balance usability with restriction goals.