Based on 35 real App Store reviews, here's exactly what users wish Intro Maker apps would build.
Features users are literally asking for in their reviews, ranked by demand.
"Great app just needs more free options"
"I just want to use it for free."
"The app to me is very limited. Not very many fonts to work with."
"It's not that easy to use, not a lot of variety to choose from."
"I can't even add text and I can't put particle title as my into title Ik I could use a template with a label but it isn't right for my channe"
"will not let me use across all my Apple devices. Paid for year on my phone and went over to my laptop to be asked to pay another year. It would be perfect if it worked and recognized that I'm logged in."
Prioritized actions based on user demand and market opportunity.
46% of complaints center on inability to do anything without premium. Offering functional free tier would differentiate from competition and allow users to try before buying, reducing acquisition friction and negative reviews.
Multiple high-severity complaints about constant interruptions that persist even after premium purchase. This is a simple fix that dramatically improves UX and retention.
Music import failure appears in 9% of reviews with high severity. This is table-stakes functionality for intro makers - users expect to add their own music without technical issues.
Users waste hours creating content only to have exports fail or appear scrambled. A reliable 'what you see is what you get' preview system prevents frustration and builds trust.
Users suggest $4-5 is reasonable for premium, significantly below current $8/month. Transparent pricing without misleading trials reduces refund requests and negative sentiment.
The full Intro Maker report includes top complaints, UX pain points, pricing intelligence, and detailed competitor weaknesses.
View Full Report — $9.9930-day money-back guarantee