Based on 35 real App Store reviews, here's exactly what users wish Flight Planner apps would build.
Features users are literally asking for in their reviews, ranked by demand.
"After downloading enough data to make this work...you can only actually plan a flight on a real computer and not on an iPad.. You can then sync to your pad but what good is that if you are mobile, have a change of flight plans"
"Why bother with a flight planning app when you can't plan a flight within the app."
"Also, there should be a print function."
"This app is only an Airport facilities directory. The chart supplement has more than just the airport facility directory. It has sections on vfr corridors. Visual reporting points. VOR test locations. Important phone numbers...etc."
"I'm unable to download any charts with a notification to try again later."
"It seems to be a handy and practical app but it crashes every time I try to download IFR Enroute"
Prioritized actions based on user demand and market opportunity.
Current apps force desktop planning then sync, users need full mobile planning capability for route changes. Offline reliability critical given aviation use cases.
23% of complaints involve activation code failures blocking all app usage. Remove this friction entirely with modern auth methods.
37% crash rate is catastrophic for aviation apps. Users need basic airport diagrams, weather, and route planning to work 100% reliably before adding advanced features.
Users trapped in subscriptions they can't cancel breeds resentment. Build trust with clear settings, easy cancellation, and feature gates that actually work.
Users expect VFR corridors, reporting points, VOR test locations - current apps provide incomplete information compared to paper alternatives.
The full Flight Planner report includes top complaints, UX pain points, pricing intelligence, and detailed competitor weaknesses.
View Full Report — $9.9930-day money-back guarantee