We analyzed 158 negative reviews to understand why users abandon the most popular Co Working Guide apps — and what they want instead.
Specific, exploitable gaps in the top Co Working Guide apps on the App Store.
Mobile app is essentially a broken viewer with 1-2 year old unaddressed bugs, causing desktop-loving users to switch platforms entirely
"This app is honestly a big reason I turned my company away from coda and to notion."
"I'll probably switch to another platform because th"
Extremely poor customer service combined with billing issues and lack of native iOS features creates hostile user experience despite functional core product
"Trust the negative reviews. I was ignored by customer service time and time again. They do not fix any reported issues you may have and they do not honor their refund policy for defective service."
"They have a habit of double charging customers"
Users feel pricing is excessive ($9.99-$120/year for co-parenting apps, unclear for Coda) especially given poor mobile functionality. Major frustration with hidden trial periods and surprise charges. Pricing not disclosed upfront creates negative sentiment. Users compare unfavorably to free alternatives like Google Calendar/Chat.
Users are willing to pay for collaboration/co-parenting tools (evidenced by multi-year subscriptions) but expect full functionality across devices. Price sensitivity is high when mobile experience is poor - users explicitly state they'd switch platforms due to mobile limitations despite loving desktop versions.
Get the full Co Working Guide report with prioritized build recommendations, missing features, and the complete competitive landscape.
Get the Full Report — $9.9930-day money-back guarantee